[ale] VPN Protocol Question
Richard at Bronosky.com
Thu Apr 16 17:34:09 EDT 2009
I think Free VPN solutions would be a great presentation topic!
.!# RichardBronosky #!.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Kenneth Ratliff <lists at noctum.net> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> The use of NAT does not automatically rule out IPSec, but the use of
> pfSense does. pfSense doesn't support NAT-T (NAT Transversal, which is
> basically just encapsulating the IPSec packet in a UDP packet), unless
> that's changed recently.
> This would seem to indicate that pfSense supports NAT-T as of 1.3
> Hrm, I need to take another look at pfSense then. The lack of NAT-T was the
> one thing that made me dismiss it the last time I looked at it.
> Thanks for the heads up!
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
More information about the Ale