[ale] China chooses FreeBSD as basis for secure OS

Richard Faulkner rfaulkner at 34thprs.org
Wed Oct 13 13:34:58 EDT 2010


Okay...this then brings up an interesting proposition.  Is it possible
to build a tenable backdoor in a distro that would go unnoticed at
source code level?  For security purposes would it be better to develop
(as a state) your own updates rather than take distro updates from
source?  Could this mark a threat to security as we see it?

Please keep in mind that I'm new to Linux and NOT a programmer...more of
a designer.  


-----Original Message-----
From: wolf at wolfhalton.info <wolf at wolfhalton.info>
Reply-to: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux! <ale at ale.org>
To: mhw at wittsend.com, Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux!
<ale at ale.org>
Subject: Re: [ale] China chooses FreeBSD as basis for secure OS
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:35:02 -0400

It would at least be a little more of a challenge than Window$

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael H. Warfield <mhw at wittsend.com>
Reply-to: mhw at wittsend.com, Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run
Linux! <ale at ale.org>
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux! <ale at ale.org>
Cc: mhw at wittsend.com
Subject: Re: [ale] China chooses FreeBSD as basis for secure OS
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:26:40 -0400


On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 15:58 -0400, Chuck Payne wrote: 
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:13 PM, George Allen <glallen01 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Apparently China is moving their entire Dept of Defense to a hardened
> > version of FreeBSD.
> > http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=1682
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
> >

> Good Choose.

I presume you meant choice and I concur.  Give that some reports are
putting the level of Stuxnet infections at over 1 million machines in
Iran and more than 6 million machines in China, anything, other that
Windows, would be a smooth move.  Nobody really knows who is behind the
Stuxnet but I would put it at 99% probability that it's "state
sponsored" and the leading contenders are Israel, the US, and Russia.
Unfortunately, any of those players are more than capable of building
something nasty for FreeBSD or Linux, or even OpenBSD if they really set
their minds to it.

Regards,
Mike
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo



_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20101013/a7c2e485/attachment.html 


More information about the Ale mailing list