[ale] Trying to Install a Realtek NIC Driver on Fedora 13

Jim Kinney jim.kinney at gmail.com
Tue Jun 29 22:50:36 EDT 2010


Since the code should be building a kernel module, be sure you have
installed the kernel-devel package for Fedora. That way you have the correct
build environment for your running kernel.

I grabbed the code and the autorun.sh looks pretty straight forward. As root
just run ./autorun.sh in the dir it untarred into. It will "do the right
thing" if you have your system setup correctly otherwise (i.e. kernel-devel
and gcc install. yum install gcc kernel-devel are your friends here).

If you are doing this on a different machine because the network won't work,
use yumdownloader kernel-devel gcc and sneakernet the rpms over (assuming
the alt box is also F13).

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marc Ferguson <marcferguson at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I've posted sporadically, but if anyone is following I can't get Fedora 13
> x86_64 Live to work properly with my video card. Luckily; i686 works. So;
> now I'm working on getting my NIC recognized so I can finally install it and
> move on!
>
> I downloaded the drivers for a Realtek RTL8111B on-board NIC. Someone
> actually started a Google Code for it. [1] I went through the readme file
> and it simply stated to run "./autorun.sh" as root. So; I did that and I got
> some errors. I worked through them, but still ran into some errors and at
> the end of it it never created the *.ko file that I need. I posted on their
> Google Code page for some help [2], so I'm hoping someone will answer. The
> project looks very new.
>
> And that's where you fine folks come into play. The details of my issue is
> on their site, but I don't think I understand how the Makefiles and
> autorun.sh files play together. There seems to be a Makefile in the root
> directory and another one in the "src" directory. The one in root is being
> executed (I think), but it's not creating the 3 simple directories it's
> supposed to create. The error I'm getting makes me believe that the second
> Makefile isn't be executed at all. Can someone shed some light on this
> issue? Thanks.
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/r8168/
> <http://code.google.com/p/r8168/>[2]
> http://code.google.com/p/r8168/issues/detail?id=1
>
> --
> Marc Ferguson
>
> Registered Linux User #410978
> www.fergytech.com | www.digitalalias.net
>
> "When life gives me lemons... I make Linuxaide, hmm good stuff!"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>
>


-- 
-- 
James P. Kinney III
Actively in pursuit of Life, Liberty and Happiness
Doing pretty well on all 3 pursuits

 Faith is a cop-out. If the only way you can accept an assertion is by
faith, then you are conceding that it can’t be taken on its own merits.
   Dan Barker, "Losing Faith in Faith", 1992
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20100629/7bcc0813/attachment.html 


More information about the Ale mailing list