[ale] Fedora or Centos - which is more relevant for someone wanting Red Hat experience today?

[Dennis Ruzeski]

Agreed-- CentOS is basically RHL with all the RedHat stuff stripped
out. Fedora is a great desktop OS and more of a spinoff of redhat than
a clone.

--Dennis



On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Richard Bronosky <Richard at bronosky.com> wrote:
> CentOS
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:52 PM,  <brian.schenken at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hiya folks,
>>
>> My work may be sending my team out for Red Hat certs this year, so I've
>> decided I'll get a head start by playing around with the closest (free)
>> distribution I can. (Ubuntu cured me of distro-hopping a few years back so
>> my experience is a bit out dated.)
>>
>> I'm looking for something that will install, be updated and maintained, and
>> host applications/services in the most redhatty fashion possible...
>>
>> If any of you work with Red Hat professionally and/or have recent experience
>> with these distros - would you offer me your opinion?
>>
>> Thanks muchly, and have an awesome weekend!
>>
>> Brian
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ale mailing list
>> Ale at ale.org
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
>> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> .!# RichardBronosky #!.
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>