[ale] Testing Gmail + FireGPG take 2

[Jim Kinney]

I'm leaning STRONGLY on crap shoot. :-)

Evolution works quite well for this.

We should have some real fun doing encryption with FireGPG...

On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 22:15 -0500, Tim Watts wrote:
> Whoa! A good sig on this msg Jim! It seems to be a total crap shoot as
> to whether a firegpg-originated msg will show up good or bad. What's
> really puzzling to me is that the SAME message shows up good for some of
> us and bad for others.
> 
> 
> On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 21:55 -0500, Jim Kinney wrote:
> > wrong signature. signing back from rich text utf-8
> > 
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 9:48 PM, <jeremy.bouse at undergrid.net> wrote:
> >         This is being sent using FireGPG 0.7.10 on Firefox 3.5.5 using
> >         text/plain & text/html formats
> >         
> >         If this GPG signature validates that sending "Rich Formating"
> >         works without problem. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > -- 
> > James P. Kinney III
> > Actively in pursuit of Life, Liberty and Happiness         
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
> 
> 
> ________
> Force is all-conquering, but its victories are short-lived.
> -- Abraham Lincoln
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo