[ale] quick poll - what monitoring tools do you use?

[Jeff Lightner]

That doesn't look like an open source solution.

 

________________________________

From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of
To: ale at ale.org
Louis Zamora
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 3:42 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] quick poll - what monitoring tools do you use?

 

www.opsup.com <http://www.opsup.com/>  has some awesome tools and
solutions.

No agent necessary. Support for any/all OS flavors. 

 

Thanks,

 

Louie

 

 

 

________________________________

From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of
To: ale at ale.org
Jonathan Rickman
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 3:19 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
Subject: Re: [ale] quick poll - what monitoring tools do you use?

 

On 4/19/07, Jim Popovitch <yahoo at jimpop.com> wrote: 

On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 22:50 -0400, Brian W. Neu wrote:
> Is anyone using Zenoss ?

I played with it, it was heavy on resource utilization even with few 
events. I was trying to run it in a vm system with 512Mb and dual 3.1GHz
CPUs.  That's not to say that you will experience the same, it could
have been something wrong with my configuration.  Looks promising 
however.

 

Same with Hyperic. I had it up and running for a day on a dual 2.8 box
with 1GB of RAM. Monitoring 20 Windows and 5 Linux boxes brought it to
it's knees. Not to mention the fact that it is agent based, and the
agent is written in Java. The agent was the top process on almost all of
the Windows machines and 3 of the Linux machines. 

 

--

Jonathan


 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...