[ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real

Scott Castaline hscast at charter.net
Fri Apr 13 16:13:49 EDT 2007


Warren Myers wrote:
> wait a second, are you trying to stack Girlfriend 10.0 on top of Wife 
> 2.0 with Wife_Friend 5.0 acting as a process monitor?
> 
> On 4/13/07, *Scott Castaline* < hscast at charter.net 
> <mailto:hscast at charter.net>> wrote:
> 
>     Jeff Lightner wrote:
>      > My point was that in global systems it is always possible you'll
>     end up
>      > with an interlink you didn't anticipate.  If for example
>     Wife's_Friend
>      > 3.0 is temporarily established in Restaurant 5.0 at the same time as
>      > Girlfriend 10.0 is established there along with Husband 1.0 the
>      > consequences can be disastrous.
>      >
>      > -----Original Message-----
>      > From: ale-bounces at ale.org <mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org>
>     [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org <mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org>] On Behalf
>     Of Lane
>      > Oden
>      > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 2:09 PM
>      > To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
>      > Subject: Re: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
>      >
>      > But you can isolate Wife 2.0 and Girlfriend 10.0 by running them on
>      > separate systems. It's important to keep Wife 2.0 and Girlfriend 10.0
>      > physically and logically separate. It is not recommended to run
>     these
>      > two applications in a chroot jail. Proper security boundaries must be
>      > implemented to avoid crosstalk. Girlfriend 10.0 is often accepting of
>      > the Wife 2.0 instance, however rarely is it the case that the
>     opposite
>      > is true.
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > -----Original Message-----
>      > From: ale-bounces at ale.org <mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org>
>     [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org <mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org>] On Behalf
>     Of Jeff
>      > Lightner
>      > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 12:47 PM
>      > To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
>      > Subject: Re: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
>      >
>      >
>      > You think Wife 2.0 has issues with that - see what happens if you
>     try to
>      > install Girlfriend 10.0 in the same system or even in a different
>     system
>      > on a different lan - eventually some interlink will cause you
>     problems.
>      >
>      > -----Original Message-----
>      > From: ale-bounces at ale.org <mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org>
>     [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org <mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org>] On Behalf
>     Of Dan
>      > Lambert
>      > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:11 PM
>      > To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
>      > Subject: Re: [ale] OT Re[2]: Is this for Real
>      >
>      > On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 13:02 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
>      >> On 4/13/07, Dan Lambert <danlambert at bellsouth.net
>     <mailto:danlambert at bellsouth.net>> wrote:
>      >>> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 12:12 -0400, Jeff Lightner wrote:
>      >>>> I certainly know the difference between Kovacs and Caesar.   For
>      > some
>      >>>> reason I associate Imogene with Kovacs but right after I'd sent
>      > the
>      >>>> email I had noticed she didn't appear in the link I sent so did
>      > some
>      >>>> Googling and didn't find anything that associates them together.
>      >>>> Apparently the pointers in my memory structures had a single bit
>      > parity
>      >>>> issue.   Despite that I won't panic...
>      >>> ----- el snippo-----
>      >>>
>      >>> I've been having parity issues with the installed RAM for years,
>      > Jeff.
>      >>> Sometimes it's magic, and sometimes it ain't.
>      >>>
>      >>> Not to worry a simple reboot brings things back for a little
>     bit. At
>      >
>      >>> least until someone asks a question that I have to do a DB search
>      > on.
>      >>> Dan
>      >> I'm not sure it helps, but rinsing my internal CPU in alcohol is
>     part
>      >> of my routine maintenance.
>      >>
>      >> Greg
>      >
>      > I've found that good Irish Ales and Stouts have the desired
>     effects, but
>      > I can't keep the RAM awash in those substances continuously, or
>     Wife 2.0
>      > tends to start having issues with my OS.
>      >
>      > Dan
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > Ale mailing list
>      > Ale at ale.org <mailto:Ale at ale.org>
>      > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > Ale mailing list
>      > Ale at ale.org <mailto:Ale at ale.org>
>      > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      > The information transmitted is the property of NCP Solutions and is
>      > intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed
>     and may
>      > contain confidential,
>      > proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
>      > dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in
>     reliance upon
>      > this information by
>      > persons or entities, other than the intended recipient, is
>     prohibited.
>      > If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and
>     delete the
>      > material from all computers.
>      >
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > Ale mailing list
>      > Ale at ale.org <mailto:Ale at ale.org>
>      > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>     <http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale>
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > Ale mailing list
>      > Ale at ale.org <mailto:Ale at ale.org>
>      > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>     <http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale>
>      >
>     Can you stack virtual machines on each other? Host 1 runs Linux, Guest 1
>     runs whatever is now Host 2, Guest 2 runs whatever on top of Host 2 and
>     becomes Host 3 etc, etc then create a 2nd similar stack of VMs. Use 2
>     USB Mon/Kybd/Mouse combos one for wife 2.0 on one VM stack and
>     Girlfriend 10.0 on 2nd VM stack. Of course they would be in separate
>     rooms unbeknown st to each other. I don't know it seems like a good idea
>     and was clear after about 8 Guiness or was it 10 , maybe
>     13,,,,,,,,,,,,,thump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ale mailing list
>     Ale at ale.org <mailto:Ale at ale.org>
>     http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://warrenmyers.com
> "God may not play dice with the universe, but something strange is going 
> on with the prime numbers." --Paul Erd?s
> "It's not possible. We are the type of people who have everything in our 
> favor going against us." --Ben Jarhvi, Short Circuit 2
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
Can I get back to you on that? I need a few more Guinessesssssssssss 
while I thinjk abut dat



More information about the Ale mailing list