[ale] Its over. Maybe

[Jim Popovitch]

On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 21:44 -0500, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> So far, the "mechanics" that have seen the voting machine prototypes 
> and/or older models have all said the system is crap. And the mechanics
> have been systematically denied access to "under the hood".

Not true.  The SAIC report from Maryland, based on the Diebold
AccuVote-TS, states that the SAIC staff had access to the machine and
souce code.  In that report they exonerate Diebold and place
responsibility on implementation and managerial processes.  

-Jim P.