[ale]OT It begins...

ChangingLINKS.com groups at ChangingLINKS.com
Tue Jan 27 05:05:27 EST 2004


I don't think you are correct.

As I mentioned before, the local Linux group has already implemented such 
code. I am not *sure* that they overcame the "emails in the body" issue that 
you raised, but my guess is that they did. I can get more information on how 
to do it if no one in the ALE knows how.
-- 
Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
Drew Brown
http://www.ChangingLINKS.com


On Tuesday 27 January 2004 00:26, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> There is no feasible way to do what you are asking for, short of
> removing the sender's email address entirely.  Even then... it is
> ineffective because the body of the email may contain email addresses
> from a reply or forward, and the diversity of email clients makes it
> near impossible to determine where a client may inject the original
> posters email address (headers included).  
> 
> Given the use of email addresses in sigs, RFCs, announcements, and code
> samples (not to mention emails containing valid addresses that posters
> are trying to share, i.e. Congressmen, etc), it would require human
> intervention (i.e. a moderator, also not perfect) to scan each email and
> decide what email addresses should remain. 
> 
> If you don't want your address public, get a diff email account for
> public lists.
> 
> -Jim P.
> 
> On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 22:32, Robert Reese wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > I'd love that to, but it isn't quite what I meant.  What I meant was
> > for the list manager (sorry, I don't know who that is) to change the
> > behavior of the archives so that the email addresses cannot be
> > obtained via bots or search engines.  I have seen a good many lists
> > that offer this protection for the  members.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Robert Reese~
> > 
> > *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
> > 
> > On 1/26/2004 at 6:37 PM Greg wrote:
> > 
> > >OpenBSD has spamd - a way to make the spamming machines groan
> > >resource-wise.
> > >I am certain that there are Linux variants on this and I would
> > >suggest using
> > >them with abandon/extreme prejudice.  If you find one that makes the
> > >machines catch fire and produce copious amounts of shrapnel upon the
> > >bodies of the spammers, then I will happily replace my OpenBSD
> > >firewall with Debian.
> > >
> > >Greg
> > 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: PGP 8.0.3
> > 
> > iQA/AwUBQBXbhrw8BOWncaQMEQLNDwCglIwoPQ+qxtWxg73pkRot3te+dyoAn0LU
> > q7IYJ+ePdbfS+Ecxh7WmWi+V
> > =d0qo
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > 
> > 
> > Type: DH/DSS 4096/1024 AES-256
> > Key ID: 0xA771A40C
> > Fingerprint: CAE2 81CA A7CD 6681 341C  E3A9 BC3C 04E5 A771 A40C
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> 




More information about the Ale mailing list