[ale] OT: C++ .NET or C++ Builder

[miguel]

i have used c++buidler, its a great tool. i think the following:

if you dont care for win32dsk/MFC/c# stuff and want to cook a quick win
app "a la" VB (and you love c++) then C++Builder using VCL is the way to
go.

thing is i have not seen much 3rd party support out there for it/VCL,
so, just something to think about.

rgds
-miguel

On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 14:10, Hogg, Russell E wrote:
> 
> I used Builder when I was in college for all my higher level courses. 
> I enjoyed it then.  Was a step ahead of Vis C++ I always thought. 
> However I've not touched it since then.  I think it might have even
> been 1.0.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________
> ctcrreho at opm.gov
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Fowler [mailto:cfowler at outpostsentinel.com] 
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 12:23 PM
> To: ale at ale.org
> Subject: [ale] OT: C++ .NET or C++ Builder
> 
> I was at MC looking for a Winbloze compiler and found C++ .NET and C++
> Builder.  I currently have .NET Studio but am not to comfortable with
> all the cruft.  If C++ Builder is better I would purchase it.
> 
> On another note, I was looking at the MC sales paper and noticed that
> a new version of RH Workstation will be on the shelves soon for $99.
> But
> you guys have me thinking about SuSE instead.  
> 
> Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> 
> -------------------------------
> --  Even though this E-Mail has been scanned and found clean of  
> --  known viruses, OPM can not guarantee this message is virus free.
> -------------------------------
> --  This message was automatically generated.
> -------------------------------di
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale