[ale] Reply-To Issue [New Thread]

[Mike Lockhart]

Think i should clarify my stance on the issue:  don't care.  Fine with
the list as is, or if it changes.  Anyway, just want to see a good
overall solution come outa this.

- mike

On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 13:46, aaron wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 April 2003 12:45, Mike Lockhart wrote:
> > I can't do that due to the fact that I use evolution for my email.  
> > - mike
> 
> It occurred to me that the minority with objections to "Reply-to=[List]" might 
> want to double check the filter options on their mail clients.
> 
> The programable action choices for filtered messages in KMail are
> quite extensive and, on review, include:
> - Set Reply-to To:
> - Remove Header:
> - Pipe through:
> - Add Header:
> - Rewrite Header:
> 
> It was also nice to confirm that I have a good "reply-to=[List] " solution if 
> ALE ever devolves back to the old ways... ;-)
> 
> I'm in agreement that a web mail avenue is not at all desirable.
> 
> peace
> aaron
> 
>  
> > On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 08:42, Mike Still wrote:
> > > Ok I don't see why procmail can't do what people want.. something like
> > > this should work.
> > > 
> > > :0
> > > * ^List-Id: ale at ale.org
> > > | formail -I"Reply-To:"
> > > 
> > > this deletes the reply-to field so your mailer should just re: from:
> > > 
> > > I haven't actually tested this, just put it together from the procmail
> > > faq and formail man page.  Somebody test this please...
> > > 
> > > If this doesn't work then something similar should be able to be used.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS/IT/E d- s++:++ a-- C++ UBLS++++$ P++> L+++$> !E W+++@ N++@ !o K--
w-- O M+@ V PS+ PE- Y++> PGP++ t 5 X+ R@ tv b+++> DI++ D+ G++@ e++> h@
r+@ x++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale