[ale] NFS as a hair-loss enhancer

[Joe Knapka]

I was wrong, the extra space in /etc/exports had nothing to do with the
problem. So now I am just blindly mystified. I've perused a few NFS
FAQ sites here and there, but none has addressed my particular issue.

But it does work now.

I'd like to look at the NFS source, but so far I haven't been able to
find it; anyone know where it lives? (Universal NFS Server v2.2beta47)

-- Joe

Joe Knapka wrote:
> 
> Hmm. Possibly there is a version issue here. I shall experiment a bit
> more.
> 
> -- Joe
> 
> "Eric Z. Ayers" wrote:
> >
> > Actually, this space may cause problems when you upgrade your system.
> > We had a situation where
> >
> > /home/export *.foo.com (rw)
> >
> > Worked great in the older release, but after the upgrade, it caused
> > the directory to be exported read-only.  Changing it to:
> >
> > /home/export *.foo.com(rw)
> >
> > without a space between the machine name and the parenthesized options
> > fixed the problem.  This occured when upgrading from Redhat 5.2 to
> > Redhat 6.2.  We were using the kernel NFS implementation both before
> > and after the upgrade.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Eric.
> >
> > Joe Knapka writes:
> >  > I'm pretty sure the problem was a syntax error in /etc/exports.
> >  > I had:
> >  >
> >  > /home/export 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0(rw)
> >  >
> >  > Changing it to:
> >  >
> >  > /home/export 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 (rw)
> >  >
> >  > (note extra space)
> >  >
> >  > made everything work (or so it appears).
> >  >
> >  > Thanks,
> >  >
> >  > -- Joe
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Jared Lyvers wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > > I have always edited the following files in order to allow my nfs to work.
> >  > > ## needed to tell system what to export
> >  > > /etc/exports
> >  > >         /dir/export     mysystem(rw)
> >  > >
> >  > > ## needed to tell system what the system is ( NFS will not work here)
> >  > > /etc/hosts
> >  > >         192.168.1.2  mysystem.foo.bar   mysystem
> >  > >
> >  > > ## needed to tell system who is allowed to export
> >  > > /etc/hosts.allow
> >  > >         portmap:          192.168.1.2:255.255.255.0
> >  > >
> >  > > Hope this helps
> >  > >
> >  > > <<--start snipit--
> >  > > #I don't know what I did, but suddenly it works. Any insight
> >  > > #into what might have been the problem is still appreciated.
> >  > > #
> >  > > #-- Joe
> >  > > #
> >  > > #Joe Knapka wrote:
> >  > > #
> >  > > #> Hi, everyone,
> >  > > #>
> >  > > #> I know I'm missing something obvious; hopefully the act of
> >  > > #> sending this email and exposing my ignorance will immediately
> >  > > #> cause the veil to be drawn from my eyes...
> >  > > #>
> >  > > #> I'm trying to install Slackware onto a machine via NFS. My problem
> >  > > #> is that no matter what I do, my NFS server refuses permission to
> >  > > #> the client. The contents of hosts.allow and hosts.deny are completely
> >  > > #> irrelevant, it seems; rpc.mountd always just says:
> >  > > #>
> >  > > #> <Some stuff about being unable to resolve the client host name,
> >  > > #> which is curious since nslookup resolves it just fine>
> >  > > #> Blocked attempt of <client address> to mount /export
> >  > > #>
> >  > > #> and the client says
> >  > > #>
> >  > > #> mount: whyme:/export failed. Reason given by server: Permission denied
> >  > > #>
> >  > > #> /export is exported to my local net in /etc/exports, exporfs has been
> >  > > #> run, and (at present) hosts.deny is empty and hosts.allow says:
> >  > > #>
> >  > > #> # It's not obvious whether the "rpc." prefix is necessary...
> >  > > #> portmap: ALL
> >  > > #> rpc.portmap: ALL
> >  > > #> mountd: ALL
> >  > > #> rpc.mountd: ALL
> >  > > #>
> >  > > #> This behavior occurs even if rpc.mountd is started in
> >  > > #> "promiscuous" mode.
> >  > > #> I have tried every conceivable combination of permissions in
> >  > > #> hosts.allow and hosts.deny.
> >  > > #> I have tried mounting from different machines, including the
> >  > > #> NFS server itself, always with the same exact results. The
> >  > > #> NFS HOWTO was unhelpful. Can anyone spare a clue?
> >  > > #>
> >  > > #> Thanks,
> >  > > #>
> >  > > #> -- Joe Knapka
> >  > > #> (now relocated from west GA to El Paso, TX)
> >  > > --end snipit-->>
> >  > >
> >  > > --
> >  > > Do, or do not.  There is no try.  --Yoda
> >  > >
> >  > > Jared Lyvers
> >  > > System Administrator
> >  > > Lewis Communications | Birmingham
> >  > > 205.980.0774 x3047
> >  > > http://www.lewiscommunications.com/employees/jaredlyvers
> >  > >
> >  > >         |
> >  > > |__--McGregor--__|
> >  > >         |
> >  > >    Jared Lyvers
> >  > > --
> >  > > To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.
> >  >
> >  > -- Joe Knapka
> >  > * What happens when a mysterious force meets an inscrutable object?
> >  > --
> >  > To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.
> 
> -- Joe Knapka
> * What happens when a mysterious force meets an inscrutable object?

-- Joe Knapka
* What happens when a mysterious force meets an inscrutable object?
--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.